John Nevard

Thanks

Thank you for your participation in the Dispute Resolution forum— User:Keithbob

john nevard - who is he?

Musings: thing is that grips my shit lately is that someone discovers some trivial thing or other and says they 'created' it. This is wrong - there's only one creator and all comes through (him - but dont get hung up about it Im not a belever in womens rights they're left aint too bad mind). Us human beings dont create anything do we? We make a damned mess of most things. No we grow stuff use our time up growing them or building them, we use our hands to paint or to carve or to shape stuff. We dont like assemble the atom and arrange it as a piece of wood or stone or a flower. We select the best stock, time again, to create an animal to produce speed or power or wool or skin or meat or bone. Anything that we make - music, for example has been made before and will be made again. so theres little point really. Anything that we make will eventually end up as dust.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.26.29 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2012‎ (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, John Nevard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atlanta Business Journal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Atlanta Business Journal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JohnThorne (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Nevard (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Blocking a /16 seems rather excessive.

Decline reason:

I am unable to see which block you are experiencing. For an admin to review your autoblock you will need to post the information about which /16 block is affecting you. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 01:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.