Talk:Moshing/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by CrowzRSA in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 00:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • I am going to have to fail the article for the following reasons:
  • YouTube isn't a reliable source.
  • References need cleaning up, as there are bare references, and ref 11 and ref 8 needs more info
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”.
  • "Origins of the term" → "Term origins"
  • "Origins of the dance" → "Dance origins"
  • Too many bold terms throughout the article.
  • Surly there is some infobox for the article
  • Quotes should have a reference directly after the quote.
  • References should only go after punctuation.
  • There are several things that go unverified.
  • A thorough copy-edit is needed before it can ever pass.
  • There are several more problems throughout the page. I suggest a Peer Review.