Talk:Mother Knows Best (song)
Mother Knows Best (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 6, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mother Knows Best (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Prosperosity (talk · contribs) 04:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I'm not sure if all the nowiki html tags and italics are necessary; it seems more likely that something was accidentally given one apostrophe instead of two at one point. How come they have been included? Also, it's a little odd stylistically for the 'ref name=' field to be filled with numbers, I would usually have a name relevant to the reference being cited.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Requested move 7 November 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that there is nor primary topic for the term "Mother Knows Best". Jenks24 (talk) 02:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Mother Knows Best (song) → Mother Knows Best – The other "Mother Knows Best" on the dab page is a redirect for an episode of a Canadian TV series. As the other "Mother Knows Best" does not even have its own article, I believe that this song has the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The dab page can be removed and hatnotes can be used if users want to find the TV episode. Natg 19 (talk) 01:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- I feel that the adages 'mother knows best'/'father knows best' are probably the primary topic people would search for, but we don't have a page discussing the phases and their usage at all. I'd support the move, unless someone makes a page about the phrase, in that case it should be moved back to Mother Knows Best (song). --Prosperosity (talk) 03:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose User:Prosperosity User:Natg 19 the target has been a dab page since 13 June 2011. To that dab page I've just filled in the redlink to Mother Knows Best (1928 film), the first Fox talkie - which looks like the most referenced subject in Google Books. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose the target is not a redirect, and per Prosperosity , this is not the primary topic either. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Mother Knows Best (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141213001851/http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/tangled-13713 to http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatrical-reviews/tangled-13713
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-11-24/film/tangled-looks-and-feels-great-so-why-is-disney-selling-it-short/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2010/nov/24/out-of-a-tower-into-our-hearts/
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://nowtoronto.com/movies/reviews/tangled/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131213115205/http://bennettsreviews.blogspot.ca/2011/10/tangled-review.html to http://bennettsreviews.blogspot.ca/2011/10/tangled-review.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ign.com/articles/2010/11/23/tangled-review
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)