Talk:Mr. Snuffleupagus

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Iswearimawriter in topic Spelling Snuffleupagus

Mr. Rogers explains

edit

Without directly addressing if Snuffy is real or not, Mr. Rogers visits with Big Bird to eplain the difference between imaginary and real.[1][2] This seems quite relevant to the article and perhaps should be included? Samatva (talk) 18:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Episode 1575". Muppet Wiki. Retrieved 5 December 2017.
  2. ^ "Classic Sesame Street - Mr. Rogers Visits". YouTube.com. Retrieved 5 December 2017.

Snuffy

edit

user:L33tminion made all references to "Snuffy" into references for his full name, "Snuffleupagus". Snuff's full name is Aloysius Snuffleupagus. While the change is technically correct, "Kidman" is more appropriate when talking about Nicole Kidman than "Nicole", it just seems wordy and unusual. On the show, he's just Snuffy. -- user:zanimum

Gaps

edit

This article needs a couple subjects developed. 1) Personality and behavior. I seem to remember him as something of an Eeyore, only maybe less in need of anti-depressants. I think there was some funny dance he'd do. Eeyore would never dance. I think he also played baseball, swinging the bat with his trunk. 2) Puppetry. How is the character brought to life? A puppeteer in the suit for the front legs and one for the back legs? Who does the voice, who does the face, etc, etc. This information should be out there somewhere. Postdlf 05:25, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


Spelling Snuffleupagus

edit

I am not a member of the wikipedia community, so I may not have a very good grasp of what is appropriate here. However, I think the "Spelling Snuffleupagus" section is irrelevant and lessens the respectability of the article. If nothing else, a list of misspellings of the name is gratuitous.

I tend to concur, it is not terribly encyclopedic. Moreover, I can make no sense of this paragraph:
Spellings on Jump the Shark's page about Snuffy's name include Snufalupogus, Snuffalufacous, Snuffalufagus, Snuffaluffagus, Snuffalupagus, Snuffelufagus, Snuffelupagus, Snuffelupigus, Snuffleufagus, Snuffleupacus, Snuffleupugas, Snuffuluffugus, Snuffulupagus, and Snufleupagus.
So I am moving it here for further discussion. In particular, the article linked has no such spellings, and the Sesame Street page of the website jump the shark is a open forum, so not exactly an authoritiative list of misspellings. Thoughts? --Hansnesse 03:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's representative of the whole internet, and even some print journalism. -- user:zanimum
It is important to list both the official spelling and other (correct or otherwise) spellings, as much because others may be looking for that word (“Snuffalufacous” for example). Having “only” the official spelling means others may well not find it. However, the sections could be profited by an overhaul. 71.34.70.201 (talk) 21:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC) A REDDSONReply
How many alternate spellings should we include? Once again, we have to rely on reliable sources. (Also, note that someone searching Wikipedia for "Snuffalufacous" is directed to "Snuffalufagus", which redirects to this article.) Powers T 12:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

My obsession with Mr. Snuffleupagus started with my liking for his name, I enjoy the “Spelling ‘Snuffleupagus’ “ part of the article, I find it humourous… Iswearimawriter (talk) 21:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

No I am not insane but....

edit

Isn't Snuffy Jewish?

Mr Hooper was, and Baby Bear is, but no, he's Hawaiian and has never practiced any sort of religion on the show. -- user:zanimum

I always figured he'd be Greek. -- Bobak 21:13, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you believe Howard Beale, the tube is both gospel and the most awesome goddamned force in the whole godless world. Thus, every character on the show practices through preaching every time they teach you something. And every time we learn something from these street preachers, we're observing that religion. Telly Monster is essentially us looking back in the mirror. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Redirect from Suffleupagus

edit

How does one redirect "Suffleupagus" to here?

Details at Wikipedia:Redirect, but I have take care of this one. Thanks, --Hansnesse 04:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Context of the Goodbye episode

edit

I just reverted the changes to remove a paragraph regarding the abuse context of the section on the goodbye episode. My own feeling is that it is encyclopedic, however, since it has been removed and reverted several times, I wanted to start a discussion about it. The paragraph in question is

The Children's Television Workshop decided on this storyline largely after high-profile (and sometimes, graphic) stories on pedophilia and sexual abuse of children on shows such as 60 Minutes and 20/20. Concerns were raised that a child may be reluctant to tell an adult that he/she had been sexually abused, especially because he/she may not be believed because of their age.

Thoughts, comments or concerns? --Hansnesse 05:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

    • I personally feel that it does not belong on the Snuffy page; to me, it really seems more suited for the broader Sesame Street article. The explanation of why the company chose the storyline has little to no relation to Snuffy himself. 69.138.229.246 05:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Inaccuracies

edit

The author appears to have confused two episodes: the one in which Big Bird is ordered to say "goodbye" to Snuffy, and the one where the human cast finally sees him. The latter unfolded by way of an elaborate plan, and Big Bird was not present when the adults finally laid eyes on Snuffy. Brithgob 04:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I stopped watching the program regularly myself shortly before Snuffy was revealed to the adults, but after Gordon, Linda, and Maria decided to believe Big Bird despite the lack of evidence. However, I do recall reading about it several times. I believe Big Bird set up a special code word ("food") he could yell when Snuffy was in the area that would cause the adults to come running to see. We need to find some more authoritative reference to get this right. (I believe Sesame Street magazine had an article on it in the parents' section around the time of the event, but it may be tricky to find copies of it.) Powers 16:09, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Trivia

edit

I removed a "trivia" item from the list, since it seemed to be unencyclopedic, relative to the article content:

It seems to me that being the subject of a comedy routine is not really a item of trivia. Thoughts? --TeaDrinker 04:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Obviously the case. Powers 14:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also, what's the deal with the trivia entry about the juggler guy or whatever? How is it even related to Snuffleupagus? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.183.218.185 (talkcontribs) .

Fair use rationale for Image:Snuffy.GIF

edit
 

Image:Snuffy.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Tv sesame street snuffy too big.jpg

edit
 

Image:Tv sesame street snuffy too big.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Really needs a pic

edit

We really need a pic for this badass. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Someone get a pic of this dude ASAP! Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Once Wiki finally gives me the option to upload, I will. A pic of Snuffy should be OK with Wiki's silly fair use rule.--Harbinger1991 (talk) 20:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sweet!!! Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 23:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Still not an established user :(--Harbinger1991 (talk) 00:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

You need to have at least 10 edits I believe. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 00:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done!--Harbinger1991 (talk) 07:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sweet! I love Snuffy!!!! Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 18:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Confusion

edit

There is some confusion on Snuffy’s sex; Because the first name is Aloysius, some people believe Snuffy is a girl. ¿Is there any reason to follow this? 71.34.70.201 (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)A REDDSONReply

Aloysius?

edit

What episode in the show revealed that Snuffy's first name is Aloysius? 202.69.188.102 (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not moved. No consensus one way or the other. Wizardman 05:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually, there was consensus, just somehow didn't read it right. Wizardman 17:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Aloysius SnuffleupagusMr. Snuffleupagus — Relisted. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC) Only his mother calls him Aloysius. Per WP:UCN, we should use the most common name. "Snuffy" may be used more often, but it's just a nickname, so I believe "Mr. Snuffleupagus" is the proper title. It's also what Muppet Wiki uses, for whatever that's worth. Powers T 14:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose "Mr." or "Aloysius" and move to the common name, just → Snuffleupagus. See Google Books: [1] vs. [2] & [3] and Google News (archive): [4] vs. [5] & [6]. (Note: this opinion should not be taken as an oppose of the move entirely: If others find some reason which I can't imagine that either Mr. or Aloysius should be used over just Snuffleupagus, then certainly Mr. is far more common than Aloysius, per the same evidence I posted).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
    • Many of the solo "Snuffleupagus" results are references to the character's family or the species as a whole. I would need more evidence that a significant majority of references are to the individual character before I could support a move to just "Snuffleupagus". Powers T 13:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Mr. Snuffleupagus sends a physical postcard to the Dodo residence in Follow that Bird

edit

In the 1985 Follow that Bird movie, the fact that Mr. Snuffleupagus sends a physical postcard and that a postman physically appears at the door, is also a proof (in the Sesame Street universe) that Mr. Snuffleupagus is not an imaginary friend at that point. Unless Big Bird sent the postcard to himself, that is. Shouldn't this reference be in the article? Considering that the running joke ends in the show after this movie is released. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PedroPalhoto (talkcontribs) 15:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mr. Snuffleupagus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply