Talk:Mundari language

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Psubhashish in topic Splitting proposal

A Mundari-English Dictionary By Manindra Bhusan Bhaduri

edit

A Mundari-English Dictionary By Manindra Bhusan Bhaduri

http://books.google.com/books?id=WmTHmL8ymy0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 04:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mundari language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect examples.

edit

Is अम कोते ते हिजु ताना ? a correct example? It appears twice with different transliteration. And none of the transliteratios seems to match the devanagari text. ~~ Zalmoksis (talk) 20:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

About recent reverts

edit

This is a message for @John B123: for the recent reverts here and here. There were (and are now) two articles that are clubbed as one: one about the language and the other about the writing system. There is no need for such a peculiar design. Secondly, my edits also contains copyedits and non-standard format that existed before. John B123, can I ask what was wrong with my edits? I should have discussed about splitting the article nevertheless, but reverting legitimate edits does not make any sense. --Psubhashish (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Splitting proposal

edit

I propose that section "Mundari language#Mundari Bani" be split into a separate page called Mundari Bani Hisir. The content of the current page seems off-topic and these sections are large enough to make their own page. In fact, the section at present is written just like an article. There should be information about a writing system inside the article but it should not include the details it currently contains. Psubhashish (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you @DePiep: for sharing. I have incorporated what I included in the article. I don't think there is any conflict between the name as both are indeed native names that are in popular use. --Psubhashish (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Draft:Mundari Bani has two sources (at least) that name the script "Mundari Bani" (without 'Hisir' then). For this, we should accept that Mundari Bani is the primary name. This also implies that the content article should be Mundari Bani (draft into article). -DePiep (talk) 18:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply