The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans women. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBTQ+ WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
Keep but discuss a move, 25 January 2020, see discussion.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support and speedy close , but the issue of title is likely very moot. This article fails notability guidelines and should be nominated for deletion. I read through all of the sources. There are no sources from before the murder, indicating lack of notability of the person, so the current title is inappropriate. The murder event has not been directly connected to Berman's activism or trans status and, while tragic, the coverage is WP:RUNOFTHEMILL for a violent crime of this sort. I think the creator of the page needs to review WP:NOTMEMORIAL. The AfD result was flawed and should be reevaluated. -- Netoholic@22:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
The article passed a recent AFD, indicating that notability was established, by consensus. The notability tag is therefore not needed and should be removed. Affied (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Passing an AFD is not an everlasting reprieve from improving articles. This event has not gotten *any* news coverage since about the two days after the murder when it was reported only in regional news or interest-based websites. This is an indication of fleeting news items - not long-lasting, notable topics. The purpose of the notice is to inform of this, and remind editors that more needs to be done. If its not, then the lack of additional coverage will likely be used as evidence that the topic should be merged or deleted. -- Netoholic@20:06, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
This comment is not true, there is RS coverage into January and February. According to WP:LASTING, not enough time has passed to determine lasting coverage - we will need to re-evaluate in a few months. In addition the policy clearly states that "This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable." I would very much like to see sources for most of your claims - which appear to be opinions - and against the consensus determined in the AFD. Affied (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've fixed the refs to display the publication dates. Most of them (10) are from a single news day Dec 27, with 1 on the 26th and 2 on the 28th. There is 1 from Dec 22. The Jan source is primary account (written by friend of the victim) - debatable as "RS". The Feb one is simply a video post and minor blurb. The reach of sources is limited mainly to Toronto, and to LGBT-based interest sites. If indeed (and I think its a big stretch) that "not enough time has passed to determine lasting coverage" ... then by the same token there had been "not enough time" when this article was first created. It was created prematurely. Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. After nearly 2 months since the story first broke, almost nothing has emerged demonstrating lasting notability. Apart from another fleeting news item about the eventual conviction for the crime, we can anticipate that this article can go no further. -- Netoholic@21:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
These are again all of your opinions with not a single policy actually cited. Please point to a specific policy that has not been met - not just your opinion. WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTMEMORIAL were already deemed to be passed in the AFD (and note you did not specify which part of the policy it didn't meet - just your opinion). The source that you deem as not an RS is also your opinion. 2 months is not the determining factor for a lasting coverage - another opinion. Limited to Toronto and LGBT is not true or based in facts. Affied (talk) 21:17, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
