Talk:Murder of Nancy Pfister

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cullen328 in topic New comment

Untitled

edit

There are a number of incorrect statements, facts, and unprofessional turns of phrase. This article needs revision, or deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1:9200:1A90:C099:16BE:BC96:3FCB (talk) 21:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC) Author Daleen Berry has contested every single bit of this info in 'Guilt By Matrimony'.Reply

This article has major issues

edit

Many elements of this article are contradicted by other reporting, and some of the facts here are completely baseless. Not controversial facts, but simple ones (e.g. there was no axe involved). This article needs to be completely rewritten, as the 2021 edit introduces massive issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.107.151 (talk) 01:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


This can't be right

edit

"Carpenter immediately called 911, and ..."

This can't be right, since the case on Forensic Files included a recording of the 911 call, which was made while Carpenter was driving her car.65.157.43.50 (talk) 00:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ridiculous sentence

edit

"Things became even more strange on Wednesday, when ...'

Nobody has the slightest idea which Wednesday this is referring to. 65.157.43.50 (talk) 00:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

New comment

edit

why is the resent relevant Pro Publica article featuring kathy Carpenter Nancy's best friend who LEGALLY shared a bank safety box ' unfair vile treatment plight' article not included on this site???....911 aside the local Aspen authorities were openly purposefully guilty also on her discusting ' she's a peon/citizen treatment" Blood on her forehead vs blood on the bedheadboard" ?????? Come on wiki!! ..truth be told??..or not??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.52.67.238 (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please provide a link to the article in question. Cullen328 (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply