Talk:Museum of Christian Art
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Museum of Christian Art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121226043536/http://christianartmuseum.goa-india.org/ to http://christianartmuseum.goa-india.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Neutral point of view?
editI do support the idea that the unique Portuguese-Indian-Christian heritage of Goa deserves to be presented in a specifically dedicated museum, to complement the architectural heritage (protected as a UNESCO world heritage site).
However, "MUST SEE", other text spelled in all-caps, and more suggest that the article includes a bit too much advertising, which is not compliant with Wikipedia standards. The wording should be revised. The marketing verbiage should be removed, the "selling points" might be expanded (what makes the museum special? what can be seen there?). -- Martinus KE (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)