Opening comment

edit

This first line has got to go: "In essence, the museum began as a place where these men could store and display skins and other trophies of their travels to Africa and Asia."

That's like saying, "after a rich and storied history all we have left once everything has been sold off are a bunch of trophies. We are going to completely ignore the everything else."

Early history needs a bit beefing up. Read "In essence, the museum began as a place where these men could store and display skins and other trophies of their travels to Africa and Asia.

Read " THE RISE AND FALL OF THE BOSTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY by Johnson, Richard I" for starters. MBCF (talk) 23:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cloud chamber

edit

In the historical exhibits section: "In the 1950s, a small cloud chamber was featured in the main entrance hall. Visitors could come within inches of radioactive material to watch the vapor trails of the particles they emitted."

--I was at the museum yesterday and there was an operating cloud chamber on display (not in the main entrance hall). This isn't very "historical". 192.52.61.205 (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suggested Move or Rename

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Page moved. Note that the oppose and support opinions agree on a target that is different from what was nominated. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The name of this museum isn't "Museum of Science, Boston". It's simply "Museum of Science". There are no other prominent museums with that name, at least none that come up on a Google search. This should be moved to Museum of Science, and a hatnote should point people to the current redirect target of Science museum, or the list of science museums, or both. Or, at the very least, the page should be moved to something along the lines of Museum of Science (Boston). Opinions? --UsaSatsui (talk) 01:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

With no discussion here, I'm gonna go ahead and request the move. --UsaSatsui (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Museum of Science, BostonMuseum of Science — Neither "Museum of Science, Boston" nor "Boston Museum of Science" are the name of the museum, it's simply "Museum of Science". No other major science museum goes by this name. The article title should match the name of the museum. --UsaSatsui (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Museum of Science" sounds like it could be about such museums in general. Carl aude:Talk 08:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. If we want to change it, under wikipedia naming convention it should be Museum of Science (Boston) ... which I find already exists, and redirects to this article, so perhaps the naming convention isn't what I think it is. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 13:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
As I mentioned above, a move to Museum of Science (Boston) would be fine by me. Regardless of where it's moved to, though, hatnotes can direct people to the proper place. I'm just concerned about this title being wrong, which "right" title it gets moved to doesn't concern me much. --UsaSatsui (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Beaver

edit

There is no context for the beaver picture, while I agree it is from the museum of science in Boston, it isn't on this page for any particular reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.1.94.188 (talk) 23:08, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Wildlife section" unnecessary?

edit

Is the "Wildlife section" section really necessary? It consists entirely of three unsourced sentences and a somewhat random picture of a beaver. Chris (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're quite correct - it looks like a joke. How did we miss it? I've removed it. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 03:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Museum of Science (Boston). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

What's the name of the topic?

edit
  • The article title is Museum of Science (Boston).
  • The logo in the legend says Museum of Science.
  • The legend is captioned Museum of Science, Boston.
  • Section "WWII" sentence one calls it Boston Museum of Science.

Until we're told which one is right, all are wrong.

Isn't the museum itself refereeing this article? If not, why? We want to continually improve Wikipedia.

Jimlue (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

"The museum's current Science & Technology Center": link is not "current" (last post was in 2008) and can't be found on the live MOS website. Unless there are objections, I'd suggest deleting. Geoffhunt3 (talk) 21:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply