Talk:Music of Final Fantasy XI/GA1

GA Review

Hello hard workers! I've been away from the wiki for a while, but when I passed through the GA review page I noticed that this poor article's been sitting in the queue for almost a month - not fair considering all the other articles that came and went through the turnstile since then. Looking over it, it's pretty solid. Very little spelling or grammar problems that I can see, but a few things could be touched up:

• Disambig link repair the following: MMORPG (1st sentence), New Japan Philharmonic Orchestra (reception section), dojin music (also reception section), Star Onions (Other Side infobox - it links back to this page!), and Digicube (2 infoboxes).
• Remove the colon in the FFXI: Original Soundtrack infobox header (for consistency's sake).
• In Music from the Other Side of Vanadiel section, "gospel" should link to "gospel music". Also in that section, there's no need to italicize the group name "Star Onions" in the first sentence.
• Categories: alpha sort "Video game songs" and "Video game soundtracks"
• The album art for the FFXI soundtrack (Ffxiost SQEX-10017~8 front.jpg) doesn't have a source.
• The Piano Collections album doesn't have track lengths like the others. If you couldn't find them yourself (goofy Square didn't put them on the back of the case), they are, in track order: 3:04, 6:08, 2:42, 3:29, 3:42, 2:07, 2:47, 4:50, 4:29, 5:06, and 2:26.

That's about it. Any questions or better ideas are welcome, otherwise, good luck! Nall (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Hooray, a review! Thanks very much for that, and for the track lengths! Fixing stuff now. --PresN (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

All concerns now addressed. --PresN (talk) 16:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Looks good on my my end. As always, a peer review would help if you want to take it further, but I'd say it's pretty solid right now.

If you're looking for more stuff to add later, I'm pretty sure the Star Onions were on a concert tour at some point. A snapshot of that might look good in reception if you can find one. Anyways, good work! Nall (talk) 17:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)