Talk:Nótt

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Bloodofox in topic GA Review
Good articleNótt has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 17, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nótt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article meets all the criteria for Good Article, on the presumption that there are no sourced theories relating to Nótt. Arsenikk (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Great, thanks! There are no notable theories that I've encountered yet. :bloodofox: (talk) 17:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply