Talk:NASAMS

The "N" in "NASAMS" has a new meaning

It's now called "National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System". 00:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Merge the two NASAMS articles?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

---

Both of these articles are kind of short, especially the one about NASAMS 2, so maybe it would be better if we merged the two articles? 00:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

I agree. The producer (Kongsberg) does not separate between NASAMS 1 and NASAMS 2 on their website, so which country that have which version of the system can not be verified. Yosh3000 (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

There is also a merge recommendation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASAMS 2. Klbrain (talk) 08:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

first active radar

sorry but it's wrong. the 9M96E1 was produced first.

Range

Issue of range, I really want to find out what is the max range of NASAMSMic of orion (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

25 km with a ceiling of 10 km according to this external link I found in the article

http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00042/Royal_Norwegian_Air__42203a.jpg

- Dammit (talk) 17:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

ARCS

What is "ARCS"? . --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 19:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

what came to my mind was "Area Remote Control System" though that's just what my mind created when reading that hyphenation. kind of works though, as From the descripiton in the article it seem to be the control unit for the group of air defence the given NASAM unit is adhered to. wish someone who recently served, or otherwise in the know would give more info, as google is no friend on this. Raymond Holmoey (talk) 18:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Acquisition Radar and Control System --Goose76 (talk) 14:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NASAMS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00042/Royal_Norwegian_Air__42204a.jpg
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00042/Royal_Norwegian_Air__42203a.jpg
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00042/Royal_Norwegian_Air__42204a.jpg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051111052205/http://www.mil.no/luft/start/RNoAF/ to http://www.mil.no/luft/start/RNoAF/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00052/Norwegian_Advanced_S_52098a.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

New orders

Are these new orders for NASAMS 2 or NASAMS. I see two different articles and I'm afraid those were mixed up.SojerPL (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Qatar

Has anyone seen updated news of Qatars NASAMS? Cant't find year of delivery. Znuddel (talk) 12:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

• FDC demonstrator of the NASAMS.jpg
• NASAMS-kecskemet-2021.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Questionable source

The source for the claim that a NASAMS 2 system is already in Ukraine is very questionable. It’s a website run by a self professed defence enthusiast, and the article about the NASAMS 2 system in Ukraine doesn’t provide any sources for where it got the information. 2A01:799:10DC:A600:E4DC:8E90:DE81:9BC3 (talk) 09:25, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Placement of "NASAMS supports many missiles" seems unsuitable.

the placement "NASAMS supports many missiles" in the development section seems poor. I think it would be better in service history. EaterOfNightmares (talk) 16:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Map of operators

The map needs an update as Ukraine has recieved Nasams. Znuddel (talk) 01:30, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

NASAMS in Chile

Chile has NASAMS 2 instead of NASAMS 1, someone should change the map of the operators of NASAMS 1, NASAMS 2 and NASAMS 3. Thanks and have a good day or night 201.219.234.137 (talk) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Correction in operators map

Hello, I ask the administrator to correct the world image that appears in the system operators area, since Chile does not have NASAMS 1 but rather NASAMS 2 with all the infrastructure. Darknessofhumanity (talk) 19:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)