Talk:Nadia Khan

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2400:ADCC:105:2200:9119:E0B7:F14F:3683 in topic Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2022

Sources

edit

If there are no sources to support notability or to support any contewnt the article is better deleted. Off2riorob (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

There are Reliable sources to support notability and to support content of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farwah khan (talkcontribs) 11:49, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

File:Nadia Khan1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Nadia Khan1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:HBNKS.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:HBNKS.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:HBNKS.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Nadia Khan with Azaan.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Nadia Khan with Azaan.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nadia Khan with Azaan.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

edit

Under a spate of recent edits the article has become a lesson in WP:PUFFERY. Needs clean up for neutrality. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Began clean up of lede, but the entire article is inadequately sourced and poorly written..... 76.248.149.47 (talk) 15:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sorry if that came across as a little harsh, but the primary account working on this needs to read the guidelines, particularly WP:NPOV, WP:MOS and WP:OWNERSHIP. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 21:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
This article is completlely neutral of its content and info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farwah khan (talkcontribs) 11:49, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Zimbio

edit

I had to remove all of the info verified by the Zimbio article. Per Zimbio and looking at the site, they publish both professional and user submitted pieces; reading through that source in more detail and looking at the author, that clearly is a user submitted piece. This then falls under WP:BLPSPS, and, as such, cannot be used to verify biographical information. Now, I imagine some of that could be verified in other places, so if anyone has sources to recover some of that info, please re-add. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:33, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nadia Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Nadia Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2022

edit

Added a category 2400:ADCC:105:2200:9119:E0B7:F14F:3683 (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply