This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
We probably need an article for the Godrej family because (a) individually, some of them are not notable and (b) their wealth is shared. Furthermore, vague newspaper talk relating to perfectly normal business practices - investing in other businesses - is rarely notable. And statements of religious belief require self-identification per WP:BLP and WP:BLPCAT. I have expressed some concerns about the editing habits of the person who keeps reinstating this information - something is not right (AGF or no AGF) when someone admits to having used multiple accounts but is not prepared to reveal them because they claim exemption. Yes, the exemption does exist but the battling that is going on merely raises suspicions, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
We do have an article for the Godrej family. It can be found at Godrej family. That being said, many of them are notable in their own right, in that they have individually been extensively covered by the press - Adi Godrej, Nadir Godrej, and Jamshyd Godrej would all seem to qualify. (There are issues raised by the fact that different publications ascribe wealth differently, even differing between articles in the same publication.)
You can express concerns all you like about my editing habits, although they belong more appropriately on my talk page. Your repeated claims that "something is not right" is beginning to feel like harassment - I am claiming a perfectly legitimate exemption. That's the point of the exemption. If you would like to pursue a checkuser in the absolute absence of any evidence whatsoever of misconduct on my part, go ahead, and I'll look forward to your apology when it's concluded - assuming you can find someone willing to do it, given the abovementioned lack of evidence that I'm up to no good. Sigh. Mandalini (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply