Talk:Nagannathaswamy Temple, Keelaperumpallam
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foul language by user
edit"(cur | prev) 17:49, 12 September 2011 Ravichandar84 (talk | contribs) m (2,203 bytes) (moved Ketu stalam to Nagannathaswamy Temple, Keezhaperumpallam: What the hell is a "Ketu stalam". And why is this article named "Ketu stalam" while it is about th"
Please mind language here. Ketu stalam is not hell definitely and affects sentiments. Also the comments were directed at a single user, while the page is not locked and changes can be discussed/made. The details of primary/presiding deity is mentioned in the article. It is commonly referred as Ketu stalam - please refer travel books. I am not contending the renaming, but comments were way too overboard. S Sriram 01:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)ssriram_mt
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nagannathaswamy Temple, Keezhaperumpallam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131112023302/http://www.thanjavur.tn.nic.in/navagrahas_m.html to http://www.thanjavur.tn.nic.in/navagrahas_m.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)