Talk:Nan Nan Resources
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Crisco 1492 in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Nan Nan Resources appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 talk 20:51, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Hong Kong based holding company now known as Nan Nan Resources went by three different names in 2011?
- Source: In 2011, the company would change its identity twice. First to International Resources Enterprise Limited in April, and then to Nan Nan Resources Enterprise Limited in October.
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This is my first ever DYK nomination. Please give feedback to help make it better.
Created by DarthCloakedGuy (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
DarthCloakedGuy (talk) 12:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC). Starting review now...
- Article is long enough and new enough
- QPQ exempt
- The image is appropriately licensed. I've taken the liberty of doing some image editing on it and uploading that.
- The sourcing seems adequate. If this were to show up at WP:GAN, I suspect the reviewer would want to see less use of press releases and the company's own website, but I think this is good enough for DYK.
- The hook fact verifies
- There's some WP:CLOP problems, particularly in the History section compared to uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/The_88_Queensway_Group.pdf. See the earwig report. These passages should be rewritten in your own prose rather than just changing a few words here or there.
- RoySmith (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- we sorted out the CLOP issues (see thread on my talk page), so this is ready to go now. RoySmith (talk) 20:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)