Talk:Nathalie Viteri
Latest comment: 2 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Nathalie Viteri appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:25, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Nathalie Viteri (pictured) was dismissed from Ecuador's National Assembly but she is now one of the top five members making interventions? Source: "dismissed... and re-elected" and top five interventions.
- Alt1... that Nathalie Viteri (pictured) was dismissed from Ecuador's National Assembly but she is now one of the top five members contributing to their debates?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Angel Reese
- Comment: She was a woman in red. feel free to fix errors.
Created by Victuallers (talk). Self-nominated at 07:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC). New enough, long enough, cited enough, QPQ complete. My only issue is the term "interventions", which I don't think will be understood by the average reader (I had to look it up and I'm at least passingly familiar with these rules). Perhaps there is another term we could use here? Or at least a link to explain it? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Maury Markowitz: Thanks Maury - it is an unusual word. I have linked it to wiktionary (which is allowed) and I have paraphrased the word in Alt1 to create an alternative term without that word. Hope that helps. Victuallers (talk) 10:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
ALT1, I think that's not entirely the same but enough for this purpose. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:07, 15 May 2022 (UTC)