Talk:Nathan Sykes (rugby league)

Comments

He is so incredibly talented........ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude899 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 17:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

---

Nathan Sykes (rugby league) → Nathan Sykes – The singer may be more current, but if he's not notable enough to have his own article...? Unreal7 (talk) 15:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

• Support. As long as there are only two uses of the name on WP, the one with the article should be at Nathan Sykes, with a hatnote to the subsection about the singer. If the singer proves to be sufficiently notable, then he should be at Nathan Sykes (singer) and this article should have a hatnote link to that per WP:TWODABS. If the singer's article starts to get more hits, then the situation should be reversed (singer at Nathan Sykes with hatnote link to Nathan Sykes (rugby league). --B2C 17:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC) actor/singer correction --B2C 21:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

• Actor? You mean singer? Unreal7 (talk) 20:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes. Thank you. Corrected. --B2C 21:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

• Support I don't know very much about rugby or pop music, but the current situation appears to be an abnormal one. PatGallacher (talk) 23:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

• Comment the edit history of Nathan Sykes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) should be moved to Nathan Sykes (singer) for the singer portion, and the disambiguation portion should be moved to Nathan Sykes (disambiguation) -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose - we seem to have a misunderstanding of what WP:DAB says and means again. As with many 1000s of articles, there is no WP:PRIMARYTOPICcorrected and there doesn't have to be. But in this case if we had to determine a primary it would evidently be the singer. We disambiguate not on what articles exist, but what articles notably could exist. While it would give me a moment's passing amusement to channel boyband fans to a not remotely notable rugby league player, good old tedious common sense prevails... In ictu oculi (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
  • You cite WP:PRIMARY, which is about primary sources. I believe you meant WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.

    The notion that "We disambiguate not on what articles exist, but what articles notably could exist." flies in the face of convention, and policy, including WP:D which defines "ambiguous" from the outset in terms of "when it refers to more than one topic covered by Wikipedia articles". --B2C 15:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Born2cycle, what's the edit history on that policy? Has it always said that? I recall recognition of what titles could/should exist being stated? In any case it doesn't say "when it refers to more than one topic covered by standalone Wikipedia articles" Nathan Sykes is covered, at greater length than the rugby league player in a Wikipedia article. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

The wording has evolved over time, of course, but the essential meaning limiting the scope of "disambiguation" on WP to conflicts between existing titles of articles has been in there a very long time. For example, back in 2007 the lead sentence was: "Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving conflicts in article titles that occur when a single term can be associated with more than one topic." [1]

I'm almost certain it has never said that potential titles should be given consideration, at least not long enough to withstand consensus scrutiny.

WP:TWODABS applies here also, since the use with an article is clearly primary over a second and only other use which does not even have an article. --B2C 16:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

• Support as an article should take precedence over a redirect. Failing that, Nathan Sykes should be turned into a disambiguation page. Mattlore (talk) 23:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

• Maybe, that's what happened with Max George. Unreal7 (talk) 11:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

• Comment Unfortunately, if Nathan Sykes (rugby league) is moved to Nathan Sykes, he will be subject to over-zealous editing by fans of The Wanted, I agree with Mattlore that Nathan Sykes being turned into a disambiguation page is the pragmatic answer (but this page also will be subject to over-zealous editing by fans of The Wanted). Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support Use a hatnote for readers looking for the singer, so long as he doesn't have a standalone article. The Max George situation should be solved in the same way. --BDD (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edit request on 29 September 2013

Birthday September 8, 1993

Jxm1249 (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

No. His that is not his birthyear. He would have been -2 when he first started playing. The source for his age is given by a link at the bottom right corner of the infobox. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 20:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Nathan Sykes → Nathan Sykes (rugby league) – This RM2 is to undo a May RM1 which moved a rugby league player stub (37,000 Google hits) into the WP:PRIMARY name space owned by the lead singer of a boy band (11 million Google hits) on the grounds that the rugby stub is a standalone rugby stub, while the sizeable article on the boy band lead singer is folded into the band article The Wanted since he's never recorded solo. http://stats.grok.se/en/201309/Nathan%20Sykes shows that the day Hello magazine broke the news that "Ariana Grande & The Wanted's Nathan Sykes" were dating we managed to redirect 5,676 of the boy band's fans in a single day to the retired rugby player. The previous RM (where the closer had little choice but follow the !votes) was in opposition to WP:DAB which says in lead paragraph: "Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving the conflicts that arise when a single term is ambiguous—when it refers to more than one topic covered by Wikipedia. (A "topic covered by Wikipedia" is either the main subject of an article, or a minor subject covered by an article in addition to the article's main subject.)" Now this RM1 is being cited as precedent for doing similar to put another standalone stub on top of another Google-magnet band member. If this move is going to be cited as a precedent then either undo it or confirm it with a RM2 with wider participation and more stringent application of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:DAB. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• Support (or move to Nathan Sykes (rugby player) or Nathan Sykes (rugby)): It shouldn't matter whether the topic is in a stand-alone article or not. A secondary subject covered on Wikipedia within another article also counts, per WP:DAB (as recently amended to make that aspect more explicitly clear). There is actually more depth on Wikipedia about the band member (within the band article) than there is in the stub about the rugby player. If one of these is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, it is probably the singer. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
• Question - would Nathan Sykes become a disambiguation page? –anemoneprojectors– 18:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Option 1 is yes, since the rugby player isn't primary, Option 2 is redirect to the folded-in article, but that presents situation where a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is buried half way down an article and a top hatnote is no use. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

I've seen (and indeed placed myself) hatnotes buried halfway down an article, at the top of a section, e.g. Sam Bailey, Sam James, or Linda Carter. Either one works for me. –anemoneprojectors– 18:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

User:AnemoneProjectors, fair point, then by all means Option 2, hatnote half-way down. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

• Support move as the rugby player is not the primary topic. –anemoneprojectors– 18:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
• Support as I'm pissed-off with continually undoing vandalism, I would suggest moving Nathan Sykes → Nathan Sykes (rugby league), and that Nathan Sykes becomes a redirect to The Wanted#Nathan Sykes. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 19:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nathan Sykes (rugby league). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.thecastlefordtigers.co.uk/playerprofile.php?pid=20

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)