Talk:National Institute of Technology Agartala

WP:INDIA Banner/Tripura Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 11:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Promotional material

A certain editor keeps adding a sentence about a session he made at the institute, while linking to his own user space and promoting his future Wiki-academy. I don't see how this session is notable and why it should be mentioned, other than for promotion. I removed the material and I ask for discussion before it is reintroduced. --Muhandes (talk) 06:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the promotional material from the article page. I have reverted one of your edits removing an external link to Aayam, which is an annual tech event organized by the institute and hence directly relevant. Please be advised that the external link is not to the website of an external or third organization and hence does not fail WP:ELNO #19. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 15:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

I removed an external link to http://www.aayam.org.in/ per WP:ELNO #19 which I believe, while not strictly an organization, to be the exact thing #19 tries to avoid, which is an external link to subjects listed and covered by the article, which are not notable by themselves. However, I don't think this is worth fighting over. As a sort of compromise, I used the same website in an inline citation as a source for a fact in the article. If other editors still feel so strongly that an external link is mandatory, I would not waste my time arguing over such a minor point. --Muhandes (talk) 10:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Puzzling phrase in the lead

I'm copy editing the article and I'm a bit confused about the meaning of "considered a new institute in the family of NIT (2006–10 session)". Session of what? (Is this an Indian usage I'm not familiar with?) Could someone explain that to me, please, so I can see how best to improve the copy? I'll continue through the rest of the article pending clarification on this aspect. -- MatthewDBA (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

@MatthewDBA: ""considered a new institute in the family of NIT" meaning: B.tech program is 4 year ( 8 semesters) program and NIT Agartala joined NIT family in year 2006.So 2006-2010 was the first batch pass out from NIT agartala.

                                                                                                     ----Anand Bajpai( Student 2007-2011)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.219.153.83 (talk) 07:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC) 

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Institute of Technology Agartala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151119152617/http://www.bschoolaffaire.com/abp_news_awards_winners_2012.html to http://www.bschoolaffaire.com/abp_news_awards_winners_2012.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)