Talk:Nellah Massey Bailey/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by DanCherek in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 14:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
This looks an interesting article. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Review
editThe article is clearly written and covers an interesting topic. It is stable, 99.9% of authorship is one user, DanCherek. It is currently ranked a Start class article, but has been developed substantially since being assessed.
The six good article criteria:
- It is reasonable well written
- The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
- It complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
- The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable
- It contains a references section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
- Although there is a heavy reliance on contemporary newspaper articles, all inline citations are from reliable sources.
- It contains no original research.
- It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
- It contains a references section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
- It is broad in its coverage
- It addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- It stays ffocused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
- It addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- It has a neutral point of view
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- It is stable
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- It is illustrated with appropriate images.
- Images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
- Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
- Images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
Overall:
- Congratulations. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article. -- simongraham (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Simongraham: Thank you for the review! I appreciate it. DanCherek (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.