Talk:Netsafe
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Panamitsu in topic confusing frame context ambiguity
 | A fact from Netsafe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the organisation Netsafe created an email chatbot that replies to scammers with questions indefinitely? Source: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/98677309/netsafe-launches-email-chatbot-to-tackle-scammers-aim-to-lower-scam-victim-numbers
- Reviewed:
Created by Panamitsu (talk). Self-nominated at 22:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Netsafe; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- I will review this. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 06:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- I am concerned about the high usage of primary sources. Especially where the organization reports on controversy about itself. I would try to find secondaries to replace them as much as possible. - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Please ping me on reply. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 06:53, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @PerfectSoundWhatever: I just updated the article with a few non-primary sources. Do you think it looks good now? Panamitsu (talk) 04:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- The new sources are great, but I was hoping you would replace the primaries, instead of augment them with more sources. Could you go through the article and remove the primaries if the facts are covered by the secondary sources? Thanks! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 04:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Whoops, sorry about that. I have removed them now. Panamitsu (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks good!
— PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 01:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks good!
- Whoops, sorry about that. I have removed them now. Panamitsu (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- The new sources are great, but I was hoping you would replace the primaries, instead of augment them with more sources. Could you go through the article and remove the primaries if the facts are covered by the secondary sources? Thanks! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 04:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
confusing frame context ambiguity
edituntil it says ministry of i could only guess the who in funded by statute by who and after, i still have to guess 2607:FB91:1220:4C64:ECD2:8312:A6D0:95FA (talk) 00:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't quite understand what you mean, but if you mean that the "ministry of" doesn't say that it's the new zealand ministry, I think that context is already given as it says earlier that Netsafe is a New Zealand organisation. If you want to add it, go ahead, I don't really have much of an opinion either way. Panamitsu (talk) 01:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)