This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
The contents of the Network economics page were merged into Network effect on 2021-05-31 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
I totally agree, though I note that Network economy is better sourced. I nominated Network economy for AfD in 2010, and aside from the section on Benkler, It hasn't changed much. I have to imagine there's more scholarship on it now, though. On Google Scholar, "network economy" turns up 31,500 results compared to the 22,100 of "network economics", so I'd choose the former in title. Raymie (t • c) 02:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Definitely support, both articles are about the same topic and "economy" is better than "economics" (it is about the phenomenon itself, not about the theoretical foundation of the phenomenon). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:33, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply