Talk:New York State Route 359
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review
New York State Route 359 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Change of Intersection Template
editThis article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 15:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 359/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Most removed, otherwise - it should be done...Mitch32(UP) 19:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, now that we know that information exists, the article is not broad in coverage since you've removed it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Readded, but not in lead and with refs.Mitch32(UP) 18:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)