Talk:New York State Route 359

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review
Good articleNew York State Route 359 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 20, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Change of Intersection Template

edit

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 15:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 359/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Your WP:LEAD introduces new, unreferenced information: One of the shortest signed routes. Also: "It is the only instance in New York of a route designated without an alphabetic suffix that terminates at both ends at suffixed routes" is new / unreferenced.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Most removed, otherwise - it should be done...Mitch32(UP) 19:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, now that we know that information exists, the article is not broad in coverage since you've removed it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Readded, but not in lead and with refs.Mitch32(UP) 18:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply