Talk:New York State Route 359/GA1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Your WP:LEAD introduces new, unreferenced information: One of the shortest signed routes. Also: "It is the only instance in New York of a route designated without an alphabetic suffix that terminates at both ends at suffixed routes" is new / unreferenced.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Most removed, otherwise - it should be done...Mitch32(UP) 19:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, now that we know that information exists, the article is not broad in coverage since you've removed it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Readded, but not in lead and with refs.Mitch32(UP) 18:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply