Talk:Niecy Nash
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dancing with the Stars
editReading WP:UNDUE weight, it is pretty aparent that inserting HUGE tables tracking every minute detail of an appearance on Dancing with the Stars are placing way too much emphasis on a minor point in Nash's life and career. Until policy based (and not "other articles have tables") rationale can be provided, it will continue to be removed. Active Banana (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- You
did not revert to name callingeditors kill me, its always your way or the highway. Fine, delete whatever you want. Why don't you delete the whole article? --Mjrmtg (talk) 18:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)- Because the other content appears to be presented in proportion to what third parties have covered about the topic. And it is not MY way, it is following the guidelines and policies that the entire Wikipedia community has agreed upon are the best to guide the project to building a great encyclopedia. If you want to create a fansite for Nash or or Dancing with the Stars that covers every gritty minute detail of her appearance on the show, feel free to do so somewhere else, but do not use Wikipedia to create that fansite. Active Banana (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- I am not covering every gritty minute detail of the show. It was just a table of her dances on the show, like other celebrities including Pamela Anderson, Evan Lysacek, Nicole Scherzinger, Melissa Joan Hart, Louie Vito, Aaron Carter, Joanna Krupa, Kelly Osbourne and Donny Osmond all have on their pages.
- Again, the fact that other articles currently suck and are filled with trivial fancruft and that we are partially failing in our attempt to make encyclopedic articles is not a policy reason for including fancruft in other articles.
- Make an arguement that for some reason that a table taking up a third of the article space to show that she did the cha-cha on week three and freestyle to "99 bottles of Beer on the Wall" on week four is somehow proportionately that important to understanding Nash and her career and we can return the content. I dont think that there is any convincing arguement. Active Banana (talk) 15:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- I am not covering every gritty minute detail of the show. It was just a table of her dances on the show, like other celebrities including Pamela Anderson, Evan Lysacek, Nicole Scherzinger, Melissa Joan Hart, Louie Vito, Aaron Carter, Joanna Krupa, Kelly Osbourne and Donny Osmond all have on their pages.
- Because the other content appears to be presented in proportion to what third parties have covered about the topic. And it is not MY way, it is following the guidelines and policies that the entire Wikipedia community has agreed upon are the best to guide the project to building a great encyclopedia. If you want to create a fansite for Nash or or Dancing with the Stars that covers every gritty minute detail of her appearance on the show, feel free to do so somewhere else, but do not use Wikipedia to create that fansite. Active Banana (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Is there any othe editor/reader that would like to see a table on Niecy's page? An admin on my page said all that is needed is consensus. Nobody is talking about 99 bottle of anything. --Mjrmtg (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- It takes consensus based on Wikipedia policy, and the way you would get me to join your consensus is to provide some reasoning that including the table is somehow not a violation of WP:UNDUE. (and note that WP:CONSENSUS is not merely a vote) Active Banana (talk) 16:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Niecy Nash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060806030652/http://niecynash.com/ to http://www.niecynash.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100908204158/http://www.okmagazine.com/2010/09/niecy-nash-is-engaged-to-the-mr-wonderful-jay-tucker/ to http://www.okmagazine.com/2010/09/niecy-nash-is-engaged-to-the-mr-wonderful-jay-tucker/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Changing Name to Niece Nash-Betts
editNiece Nash's last name is now Nash-Betts. This should be updated, with a redirect page created for Niece Nash to Niece Nash-Betts. Travis H. O. (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)