Talk:No Way Out (1987 film)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Negative of a Polaroid?
editThe only major piece of forensic evidence in the case is the negative of a Polaroid
Is this what actually happens in the film? Because, Polaroid pictures don't have negatives. 207.31.229.4 13:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- The article about instant films explains their use of negatives. I have removed the reference to the Polaroid as inessential in a brief summary. — O'Dea (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Goofs
editI fail to see how any of the 'goofs' are actually goofs. Heck, CNN makes typos to millions of people live all the time. I have no doubt the Pentagon could misspell a word. Lots42 23:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:NoWayOut3.jpg
editImage:NoWayOut3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:No Way out.jpg
editImage:No Way out.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for the "too long & overly detailed analysis"
edit,it has allowed me to understand the plot twist in the end : it is not clear at all in the french version. As for the first 15 minutes of the film, the meeting and "coup de foudre" ("lightning stroke") between Susan & Tom, they are beautifully filmed & most impressive...T.y. Arapaima (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I have shortened it a little. I think it's still too long, but that was the best I could do gramorak 12:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gramorak (talk • contribs)
Brad Pitt
editIf it's uncredited and unconfirmed, it shouldn't be here, so I'm taking him out. Mingmingla (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- He was an extra. He is clearly visible behind Kevin Costner on the left side of the screen as he walks into the big party. There are several clips of this on Youtube (I just checked because I didn't want to simply assume). This was before Growing Pains when he only did extra work. -- kainaw™ 23:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
- Citations have been added to confirm Pitt's role. — O'Dea (talk) 10:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
George R R Martin
editThat's totally him in it, isn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.34.59 (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)