This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From the most current edit of "Design and development": The FJ-4 was intended as an all-weather interceptor... Is this correct? In 1950s Navy terminology, "all-weather" was typically used for fighters with onboard radar (e.g. the F2H-3/4 Banshee, F3H Demon, F3D Skyknight), and the FJ-4 conspicuously lacks this feature. The books in my library never refer to the FJ-4 as all-weather. Carguychris (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
