Talk:North Stradbroke Island

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal North Stradbroke Island is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Islands C‑class

	Islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Major update

Page has been augmented to reflect the remarkable progress made on native title and land conservation issues during the last 30 years. --Leeshipley 01:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Kath Walker

The link to Kath Walker is a redirection and has been changed to her preferred native name, Oodgeroo Noonuccal, which is now the title of her page on Wikipedia. --Leeshipley 01:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Population

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The 2011 Australian Census recorded a population of just 117. It is well known that some Aboriginals do not participate in census taking for historical reasons. 117 seems significantly lower that the real figure. How should we proceed? - Shiftchange (talk) 10:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic