Talk:Novi Kneževac

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Filić, Firić, Firiđ?

edit

What is a correct name of this village anyway? In some sources I have, it is Filić, in another Firić, and in another Firiđ. What is right and what is wrong here? PANONIAN (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ok, the correct name is Filić. This is 100% because I was today in front of the village road sign which signs the name of the village on the road. So, the correct name is Filić. I hope I helped with this.

Many other info's about the region of Filić you can see on www.noviknezevac.info too. This site gives many information's to the citizens of Novi Kneževac. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.18.49.56 (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Novi Kneževac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply