Talk:Nurses' Health Study
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AddisonBlacksmith.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Summary of results; links to other mass studies
editWould be nice to have in the article. And some links to other mass heath studies such as the Framingham heart study (sp?). 80.2.192.24 (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Reasons for NOT doing longitudinal studies are numerous: cost, difficulty finding sponsorship, potential conflict of interest in sponsorship, etc. MaynardClark (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Criticism Section
editThis study has come under recent criticism by other large scale epidemiological studies, which should be noted. 68.232.186.147 (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have any links or Pubmed IDs? NW (Talk) 15:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Well, the epic hormone therapy disaster comes to mind as being one of the spawn of the Nurses' Health Study. I have to say, it's a little baffling to see a booster list of 4 major results with no mention of that. --Gwern (contribs) 17:20 10 January 2015 (GMT)