Talk:O'Reilly Open Source Award

Awards Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

move to O'Reilly Open Source Award?

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Edited article to reflect Google name not used since 2010. Should article be renamed? Mike Linksvayer (talk) 20:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Excellent question. It's hard to say the awards are the same when half of the companies granting them went away, particularly when that half is arguably the biggest half. I don't have the answer, but have nevertheless proceeded to renaming. Count this as a weak support for renaming. If others feel this is wrong, I won't resent a revert. --Chealer (talk) 04:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add basic information of why they won?

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should we add some basic information (1-2 lines each) on what the person did? What their contributions were etc.

And what about people who don't have a Wiki page?

People would have to google them specifically. We could provide a link to their homepage etc.?

Will be happy to do this if it makes sense.

dufferZafar (talk) 17:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Just a list of winners

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

moved discusssion to Talk:OSCON#Proposed_merge_of_O'Reilly_Open_Source_Award_into_OSCON

There's not much here and hardly any WP:INDEPENDENT sourcing. The whole article should be merged to OSCON which itself is pretty anemic. Toddst1 (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Discussion started at Talk:OSCON#Proposed_merge_of_O'Reilly_Open_Source_Award_into_OSCON. Toddst1 (talk) 00:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic