Talk:O ewiges Feuer, o Ursprung der Liebe, BWV 34
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sainsf in topic GA Review
 | O ewiges Feuer, o Ursprung der Liebe, BWV 34 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 7, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from O ewiges Feuer, o Ursprung der Liebe, BWV 34 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Text poet
editIf we mention only Bible text in the infobox, it looks as if all text was biblical, while it is only three words. I think even if we don't know the name of the author we could do justice to his achievements, at the same time establishing the link to Cantata texts. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that's probably undue for only three words - removed. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- As you wish, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:O ewiges Feuer, o Ursprung der Liebe, BWV 34/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I can do this today. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Lead
- You may like to link alto, oboes, continuo
- yes but better in Baroque instruments, ok, alto yes --GA
- What are the "both occasions"?
- should "wedding and Pentecost" be repeated? --GA
- Looks better now, you discussed it in the earlier paragraph, so it wasn't immediately clear what you were talking about. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- should "wedding and Pentecost" be repeated? --GA
- History and words
- I think it should be "Bach scholar", not "the Bach scholar".
- That seems to be an American/English thing, - Tim would like the "the" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think I didn't notice the "the" in your earlier articles. Tim riley seems to be away for a month. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- That seems to be an American/English thing, - Tim would like the "the" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
This lists some dead links : [1] @Gerda Arendt: I think we need dead URL templates here or search for new versions of the URLs. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 16:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- No, we don't - the links work fine if you click on them from the article. The problem is actually that Checklinks doesn't know how to parse links with square brackets in them. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting me. Seeing no more issues, I am glad to promote this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:51, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
That's it. Great job! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)