This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It reads "From 1789–1791, Belgrade was again under Austrian rule" Nothing wrong with this sentence, except for the word again. Because the first Austrian rule (1718-1739) hasn't been narrated in the article. Either the first Austrian rule should be summarized or the word again should be omitted. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Slavic word "knez" is usually translated as "prince" or "duke" - but "obor-knez" is entirely different thing. An obor-knez was elected or appointed officer, so that position has nothing to do with the nobility.N Jordan (talk) 01:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg)