Talk:Only Fools Rush In
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Only Fools Rush In appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the director of Only Fools Rush In said motorcycles are harder to film than cars? Source: '即使是有过多次赛车拍摄经验的韩寒导演都直言非常困难：“（摩托车）拍摄的时候，难度会高很多。尤其是用无人机的时候，（拍汽车）其实是可以无限去接近那个车的，大不了就是撞废一台无人机，为了追求一个好看的镜头，其实这个损失是可以承受的。但是摩托车就不行，无人机是不能撞到摩托车的车手的。”'[1]
Created by Mx. Granger (talk). Self-nominated at 12:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC).
Article creation date versus filing date okay. Article length meets the requirement at 1928 characters (337 words) readable prose size. Article citing is mostly to Chinese sources but seems okay; article neutrality is okay and no evident signs of copyvio. QPQ done. Hook length okay, sourcing is Chinese but AGF (and a machine translation I ran, although full of florid language, supports it). Hook interest is very good – if I hadn't reviewed this and saw it on DYK, I would have clicked through to find out why. Good to go. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: looks like a couple of bare URL references are added—DYK rules say those have to be filled in before promotion, could that be cleared up? Sorry about that :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:47, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Thanks for letting me know – I've filled in the references. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:06, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: My bad on missing the bare refs during the review, will be sure to check for that in the future ... Wasted Time R (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Mx. Granger! Wasted Time R, glad to hear you're more vigilant now, but you should know that the bare refs were added after your review. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Mx. Granger: looks like a couple of bare URL references are added—DYK rules say those have to be filled in before promotion, could that be cleared up? Sorry about that :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:47, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
