Added Serbia

edit

Added Serbia to the belligerents section, because they joined as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.169.147 (talk) 05:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Removed Serbia from list, does not posses a blue-water navy and no source sites Serbian involvement in anti-piracy operations in Somalia. Kuname (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Serbia is a part of the operation http://eunavfor.eu/lithuania-hands-over-eu-naval-force-vessel-protection-duties-to-serbian-forces-after-keeping-world-food-programme-ships-safe-for-four-months/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.149.221.44 (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

This article doesn't say Serbia is involved, if it was, the forth months have passed. And Serbia doesn't have a blue-water navy therefore, it cannot be involved in any way. --92.240.58.7 (talk) 18:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Relationship of CTF 150, CTF 151, and Operation Atalanta

edit

It would be very helpful to have an explanation of the relationship between CTF-150, CTF-151, and Operation Atalanta.

Operation Atalanta a campaign of the European Union to stop the piracy off the Somali coast. Combined Task Force 150 and Combined Task Force 151 coalition force counter-piracy operations in the region.--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply



European Union Naval Force Somalia – Operation ATALANTAOperation Atalanta — Commonly used name in the media etc. Like Operation Artemis. SSJ t 19:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/patino/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

EU Navfor Somalia - Operation Atalanta

edit

Dear Middayexpress,

I represent the media branch of Operation Atalanta and noticed that following an update to the wikipedia page, you reverted to the original. Could I please kindly request that you allow us to make changes to ensure that the information displayed is correct.

Kind Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eunavformedia (talkcontribs) 08:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The EUNAVFOR webpage is deadlinked [1]; it also didn't originally use some of the indicated phrasing [2]. Additionally, Wikipedia pages are named according to the most common name, which is not necessarily the official name. Here, it would be Operation Atalanta (please see WP:COMMONNAME). Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Please review the links modified on the main page...—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Operation Atalanta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply