Talk:Original Schtick

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Original Schtick is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Film: Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Lack of citations and original research

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article has a minimum of citations regarding certain claimed events or citations are recursive-referential to the film itself with no external collaboration (including the incident of the director being present at a screening). The editor who had removed the tags is also the editor responsible for making the article, indicating possible bias or intent to spread original research within the article. Additionally most of the citations are of "dead tree" media that are hard or practically impossible to verify or recall.2601:280:C680:C530:9C56:49FE:4837:EE39 (talk) 04:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic