Talk:Our Lady of Good Health

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Thunderforge in topic Can we be more specific about the dates?

Tatched

edit

I'm not sure if this is supposed to mean separated (the opposite of detatched) or "thatched". John Carter 15:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry its Thatched. Cheers ώiki Ѕαи Яоzε †αLҝ 20:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

NPOV?

edit

This article seems to lack a NPOV, wondering if anybody else felt the same? If so, then help in improving this article would be appreciated. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Our Lady of Good Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Our Lady of Good Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Can we be more specific about the dates?

edit

The article says that the two apparitions were "in the 16th to 17th centuries". That's a 200 year span! Surely we can narrow them down to at least a particular year. This article says the apparitions were in 1570 and 1587, but I'm not that sure it's a reliable source given that it's a travel guide. Thunderforge (talk) 05:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply