Talk:Our Lady of Lourdes Academy
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI just reverted a change, but I feel that even before this the article wasn't exactly npov namely in the news area pertaining to the honor roll, so thus I also tagged it. vanis 17:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
If you did some little research you would see that what there was stated is the truth.. It was named one of the top 50 catholic schools in the United States for 2006. Callelinea 16:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Added appropriate categories. Aafm 15:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Our Lady of Lourdes Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090429033455/http://www.advanc-ed.org:80/schools_districts/school_district_listings/? to http://www.advanc-ed.org/schools_districts/school_district_listings/?
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC)