Talk:Over the Limit (2010)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by NiciVampireHeart in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Over the Limit (2010) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Over the Limit (2010) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 1, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that four separate wrestlers suffered legitimate injuries at WWE's Over the Limit pay-per-view? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Over the Limit (2010)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
(All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)
- C. No original research: (No original research found.)
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
- B. Focused: (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias: (No bias found.)
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc: (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: (Captions and pictures are good)
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. Much appreciated. NiciVampireHeart 17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
