Talk:Over the Limit (2010)/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by NiciVampireHeart in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I will be reviewing this article and let the nominator know what needs to be improved if needed. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   (Quality is very good.)
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:   (Everything is perfect in this section.)
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:   (All the sources come from 3 different websites but still provide reliable info.)
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   (Every paragraph has at least one source/reference.)
    C. No original research:   (No original research found.)
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:   (Covers all the details prior, during, and after the matches.)
    B. Focused:   (Always stays on topic about the PPV.)
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:   (No bias found.)
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:   (Took a look at the article history and everything seems to be fine.)
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:   (All the images are properly sourced and copyrighted. Non-free images have fair use rationales.)
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:   (Captions and pictures are good)
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:   Very good article and I am also very impressed...PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you. Much appreciated. NiciVampireHeart 17:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply