Talk:P. Kevin Castel
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bot-created subpage
editA temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/P. Kevin Castel was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 17:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The curious case of the ChatGPT lawyer
editIn an civil case in a federal district court over which Judge Castel presides (https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/mata-v-avianca-inc/), a lawyer for the plaintiff has gotten himself and his firm in trouble for using OpenAI's ChatGPT to write his court filings, ending up citing several non-existent cases to make his case, then further providing ChatGPT-generated content from those cases when the court pressed him for it.
The case is still ongoing, and judge Castel hasn't ruled on these happenings yet, but it seems like a good candidate for inclusion in his "Notable Cases", either now or once the case is resolved.
This has significant media coverage ( ArsTechnica, CNN, HuffPost, BBC, NYTimes, etc,)