Talk:Pantsuit
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senate Ban
edit> Pantsuits were often deprecated as inappropriately masculine clothing for women. For example, until 1993, women were not permitted to wear pantsuits (or pants of any kind) on the United States Senate floor.[7][8][9] In 1993, Senators Barbara Mikulski and Carol Moseley Braun wore pants onto the floor in defiance of the rule, and female support staff followed soon after, with the rule being amended later that year by Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Martha Pope to allow women to wear pants on the floor so long as they also wore a jacket, thus allowing pantsuits, among other types of clothing.[8][9]
I'm genuinely looking for a canonical source on the above claims.
Citation #7 does include the line "After all, it wasn't until the early '90s that women were even allowed to wear pants on the Senate floor." -- but doesn't say anything about how that ban was placed or enforced. Citation #8 Also cites the presence of a dress code. But the dress code itself should be available somewhere, no? Citation #9 redirects from <http://www.rollcall.com/features/50th-Anniversary_2005/fifty_anniversary/-9592-1.html> to the front page of Rollcall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.16.82.118 (talk) 20:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Is "pant suit" not correct? I do not see it written that way on the page. 63.227.180.109 (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
"The most prominent advantage cited, however, is modesty: a woman wearing a pantsuit cannot be a victim of upskirt photography or accidentally expose herself by leaning over or sitting awkwardly."
Is this really the driving reason why people choose to wear pantsuits? Is this why Hillary Clinton wears a pantsuit? Need some kind of supporting citation for this statement, which seems highly speculative. 76.21.9.166 (talk) 03:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Pantsuit Power
editWhat do people think about fitting the below text into this article?
Good luck, 69.50.70.9 (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Choreographers Celia Rowlson-Hall and Crishon Landers with the help of film producer Mia Lidofsky created a flash mob dance video on 2 October 2016 in support of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 set to the music of Can't Stop the Feeling! by Justin Timberlake — with all of the dancers wearing pantsuits in reference to Hillary Clinton's outfit of choice.[1] They called the event #Pantsuitpower Flashmob for Hillary.[1] The video became popular, with coverage in news media including The Washington Post, The Guardian, and Vogue, — and garnering over 2 million views on Facebook.[1][2][3] From New York City, the Pantsuit Power movement then spread to Raleigh, North Carolina on 23 October 2016 with another flash mob.[4][5]
- ^ a b c Kaufman, Sarah L. (7 October 2016), "'Pantsuit Power' flashmob video for Hillary Clinton: Two women, 170 dancers and no police", The Washington Post, retrieved 25 October 2016
- ^ Moss, Emma-Lee (5 October 2016), "New York flashmob ready to 'dance Hillary Clinton into the White House'", The Guardian, retrieved 25 October 2016
- ^ Regensdorf, Laura (3 October 2016), "Power Moves in Pantsuits: A Hillary Clinton–Inspired Flash-Mob Dance Party Takes Manhattan", Vogue, retrieved 25 October 2016
- ^ Quesinberry, Justin (23 October 2016), "'Pantsuit Power' event held for Clinton in Raleigh", WNCN, retrieved 25 October 2016
- ^ Borlik, Joe (23 October 2016), "Large flash mob dances in downtown Raleigh for Hillary Clinton", WGHP, retrieved 25 October 2016
Requested move 4 June 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No move. There is no agreement that the proposed title is more common, or a point of WP:COMMONALITY, so the article stays put per WP:RETAIN. Cúchullain t/c 17:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Pantsuit → Trouser suit – Per WP:GLOBAL. Chicbyaccident (talk) 00:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support more understandable In ictu oculi (talk) 06:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:CommonName. Rreagan007 (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose, WP:RETAIN. "Trouser suit" is not used in American English, so there is no WP:COMMONALITY in the proposed title. Dekimasuよ! 06:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.