Talk:Papuella

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Beetles Low‑importance

	Insects portal Papuella is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Synonym

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Per https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247543347_An_annotated_checklist_of_the_Handsome_Fungus_Beetles_of_the_world_Coleoptera_Cucujoidea_Endomychidae this appear to be a junior homonym of a beetle belonging to Anamorphidae, which was named two decades prior. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Hemiauchenia: If it helps, Papuella Richards 1973 (the fly genus) was already renamed to "Papuellicesa" in 2010: [1] However, Papuellicesa already has its own article (created two days after this one was), and the Wikidata item linked to this article is actually for the beetle genus, judging by the linked identifiers and assigned parent taxon. What a mess, but unfortunately not unique. Monster Iestyn (talk) 19:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Synonyms inevitably result in a lot of mess. I've changed this article to be about the beetle, if that's ok. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Hemiauchenia: Hopefully it's ok, but I honestly have no idea. I've removed the incoming links from the fly articles. (Also if I'm being pedantic, synonym =/= homonym at least in taxonomy) Monster Iestyn (talk) 20:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree about the homonym=/= synonym thing, sorry for the unclear wording. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic