Talk:Parenthood (film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Opening heading

edit

What? No plot? No spoilers? I'll put one here. 4.240.36.14 03:37, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Diarrhea Song

edit

{{spoiler}}

IRONY

edit

At one point in the film, Gil says, "Maybe we should have a dozen kids!" Ironically, Steve Martin was in Cheaper by the Dozen in which his character actually did have a dozen kids.

That is not ironic, it's not even written in the correct tense.--Ganley894 20:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Heidi's grandfather meets Mozart. --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

New TV Show

edit

I just read on a blog that NBC has green-lit a new version of a Parenthood tv show for I am assuming next fall. Apparently it will be a one hour 'dramedy.' Obviously, a blog is not a credible source so I was wondering if anyone knows of a credible source citation so, if true, it can be added to the article? 24.39.98.137 (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


I heard about that on NPR yesterday. Soltera (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested Move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply



ParenthoodParenthood (film) – 19:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC) My position is that most searching for "Parenthood" these days are either looking for the current 2010 TV series, or they are actually searching for topics on parenting. Page view statistics support this claim with twice as many visiting the two I mentioned as opposed to the 1989 film (I feel the difference would be even more if parenthood's primary topic wasn't the 1989 film). I am proposing that we disambiguate the term. GoneIn60 (talk) 21:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I doubt your proposal is really moving this page to Parenthood (disambiguation). You probably mean moving this page to Parenthood (film) and then Parenthood (disambiguation) to Parenthood? Jafeluv (talk) 22:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
You are correct. The intention is to remove the primary topic. I have fixed the link which will hopefully update here and on WP:RM. Following this move, the plan would be to next move Parenthood (disambiguation) to Parenthood as you stated. GoneIn60 (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Credits edits

edit

Joaquin Phoenix was credited as Leaf Phoenix in this film and others. But he is generally listed as Joaquin now, and it's what he goes by. I think it would be better to list his credit as Joaquin and include "(credited as Leaf Phoenix)" or "(as Leaf Phoenix)". I made this change but it was reverted without comment by TheOldJacobite.

Also, I think it's confusing to mention the actor's last name in parentheses after the character's name when they have not yet been mentioned in the text. Either remove the actor's name, or mention the actor in the list of principals at the beginning of the article. I made this change as well, but it was also reverted.

Jer ome (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The actor should be credited just as he was in the film, with a piped link to the more common name. This is how it is always done. There is also no reason to give the actor's full name in the plot section, as they are all listed in the cast section, which is why the last name is given in parentheses. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 00:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Parenthood (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply