Talk:Parker Lewis Can't Lose
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Parker Lewis Can't Lose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cleanup
editThis article is full of dirty Original Research. Namespace is not for random people's personal analysis!--Drat (Talk) 13:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. Too much original research and do we really need the 'International' section? Lots42 (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Parker Lewis Link
editThere's a link to the character Parker Lewis that redirects to the article about the show. This is a very unfortunate loop that should be rectified. Andrew 14:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Parkerlewis.jpg
editImage:Parkerlewis.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Episode list
editAny objections to splitting the episodes into a separate article (typically named "List of title episodes") and converting it to use the episode list templates? Andyross (talk) 21:43, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- New page created at List of Parker Lewis Can't Lose episodes. Andyross (talk) 14:21, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
"Response Section" needed indeed!
editThere should definitely be something in there about how the critics responded to this wonderful series. It's remarkable how original a series this was; the acting, the look-and-feel, and even the plotting--with many episodes taking the form of a morality play--made this one of the most memorable series ever.
I couldn't believe it when a pal of mine dismissed "Parker Lewis Can't Lose" as just a knockoff of "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", for it was SO much more than that. Indeed, the surrealism that infused the first two seasons was nowhere present in that film, and the its writing was never so creative. Of course, the third season downplayed a lot of that, as the article makes clear and as was implied by the shortening--and emasculation, I'd argue--of the title for the third season.
But for two glorious seasons, "Parker Lewis Can't Lose" truly couldn't lose. What a consistently fantastic creative collaboration! But whatever happened to Corin Nemic? [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3:1000:5B1:9227:E4FF:FEF0:BBDE (talk) 07:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- The third season should have been called "Parker Lewis Can't Win". It bore little resemblance to the first two seasons in content. Parker Lewis the red haired kid had elements of Archie (the comics character). Jughead is now a nerd, Moose has been replaced by Kube, antagonist Reggie has been replaced by his sister, etc.(5.8.190.86 (talk) 10:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC))
"Not a problem" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Not a problem has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 13 § Not a problem until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)