Talk:Passive intellect

Philosophy: Mind / Ancient / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind
	Ancient philosophy
	Medieval philosophy

"Knowledge in act"

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I take it this was a proofreading error and that the phrase is supposed to be "knowledge in actuality". Fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.86 (talk) 16:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Only Philosophy

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I removed reference to psychology in this article as it seems to be no longer in wide use. If it is important enough, I would suggest a separate article for it. JEN9841 (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree. In psychology, the term is "passive knowledge". --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 09:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

passive intellect in Islamic philosophy

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I lately created an page about passive intellect in Islamic philosophy. as you proposed on the talk page of Draft:Mehdi ghaed/Aql Bil Quwwah, I would like to add a sub-heading "Passive intellect in Islamic philosophy".--m,sharaf (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Passive intellect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050426192837/http://www.dominikanie.pl/old/tomasz/oui/oui_t.htm to http://www.dominikanie.pl/old/tomasz/oui/oui_t.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic