Talk:Pat Ragusa/GA1
Latest comment: 1 month ago by WikiOriginal-9 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 22:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 01:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Added a few cats.
- "He immediately won the starting job for the St. John's Redmen football team as a freshman that year". Remove "that year". The next sentence begins with that too. 1981 is listed several times. People can assume that was his freshman year.
- Add "born to Italian immigrants" to that part of the lead so readers understand he is Italian too.
That's all. This one reads very well. Nice work. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- @WikiOriginal-9: Added the immigrants part to the lead, removed the two mentions of 'that year' in succession. Is that good? BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that looks good. Passing the article. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.