Talk:Paul Cosford
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Paul Cosford appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 11:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that in 2019 Paul Cosford presented findings that lung cancer (pictured) in people who have never smoked is increasing and is more common than many people think? Source: The authors include Prof Paul Cosford...the absolute numbers and rates of lung cancers in never-smokers are increasing..People will find these numbers very surprising. They rarely think of lung cancer as a non-smoker’s disease. They’re so focused on smoking as the main risk factor that we forget that there are quite a few causes of lung cancer that affect non-smokers." [1][2]
- ALT1... that in 2019, Paul Cosford and his colleagues found that lung cancer (pictured) was more common in non-smokers than was generally thought? Philafrenzy (talk) 22:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Santa Claus (steamboat)
- Comment:
Adding DYK now due to time, but still have a lot to tidy on it. I will remove construction tag when complete.done
5x expanded by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 22:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Fascinating and deeply researched article. The startling claim is reliably cited. No Swan So Fine (talk) 18:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)