Talk:Pedal curve
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Epicycloids
editHm. Contrary to its pedal curve page, this mathworld page says the epicycloid does not give a rose. But hypo and epicycloids are such close cousins they should both or neither. I'll check carefully. 142.177.20.80 01:08, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- The page is mistaken. Working in the complex plane and starting with and (epicycloids have , hypocycloids ) we get
- and, finally, the pedal curve is
- Noting and letting
- which is obviously a rose. 142.177.126.230 16:25, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Mathworld's been corrected =) 142.177.126.230 23:07, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Contrapedals
editMore work needed on contrapedal curve; mainly, what's done in higher spaces? While one could sensibly use the curvature vector, one could also use the perpendicular subspace...and somehow the latter is more appealing. Kwantus 18:53, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Merge with Orthotomic
editThe orthotomic is simply the pedal magnified by a factor of 2. The current orthotomic article is just a stub, so the merge should be easy and it seems silly (not to mention a content fork) to have two articles about essentially the same curve.--RDBury (talk) 23:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- The merge is done.--RDBury (talk) 13:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
A little history would be nice
editIt would be nice to know why on earth this construction is a thing, and why it's called a "pedal" curve. Something to do with feet or walking? 203.13.3.94 (talk) 23:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)