November 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Chaudhry Naseer Ahmad Malhi, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dhtwiki (talk) 07:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to West Adelaide Football Club— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 (talk) 05:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. L293D () 02:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Anon123

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Anon123, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. • Gene93k (talk) 04:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Dan arndt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sons of Beaches have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dan arndt (talk) 01:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Water bottle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Meters (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Daniel Hotchkis. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Aasim 04:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Extended content

Bowral NSW

edit

Just letting you know that when searching for Bowral in Edge or IE the Wikipedia entry which comes up on the RHS say BOWRAL and subheading is 'A town in Wales. Obviously this should be New South Wales but I couldn't find where to change this, if it's even possible. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.13.3.93 (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Doctorhawkes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Roger Tuivasa-Sheck have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Morley-Windmills SC, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Firestar464. I noticed that you recently removed content from Take It to the Limit (Eagles song) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Firestar464 (talk) 06:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sister Ray, you may be blocked from editing. freshacconci (✉) 01:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Summer Olympics medal table. David Biddulph (talk) 23:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at From a Buick 6. Baden-Paul (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of earth stations in Australia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you recently removed content from Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Despite your edit summary, one is indeed sourced in this article, and all of them are mentioned in the respective linked articles Meters (talk) 03:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Qin dynasty, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. dudhhrContribs 00:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to National Emergency Medal, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply